compliance

Both keep keys out of application memory; they differ in who you must trust and what you can prove. The scored answer chooses by threat model and requirement, not by fashion.

Regulated data turns every copy the AI pipeline makes into an audit question. The scored answer keeps the regulated data out of the model where possible and brings each remaining copy under the regime.

Tiers are decided by use, not by model. And for high-risk providers, Article 15 makes AI security a legal requirement.

Location of the office is not the test. Where the system is placed, used, or where its output is used, is.

Three GDPR questions that shape every AI system handling EU personal data. The scored answer gets the legal structure right and turns each into engineering work.

Regulatory reporting has to plug into ordinary incident response. The scored answer knows who reports what to whom and by when, and is honest about the open question on timing.

The one governance answer that goes stale. The scored answer gives the timeline as amended in 2026, the fine tiers, and a process for tracking changes rather than memorised certainty.

There is no single US AI law, and the state laws keep changing. The scored answer knows which ones are in force, which were replaced, and which security obligations they actually create.

Reconcile a compliance dashboard with actual organizational scope. Preserve the original report, expose unassessed systems and assign evidence collection without inventing a new incident.